Category: All Publications

• 88% think that auto repair shops inflate the cost of vehicle repairs, compared to 77% in 2017.
• 86% of Ontarians support government and law enforcement agencies investing more resources to investigate and prosecute fraudulent claims, compared to 78% in 2017.
• 86% of Ontarians feel that more needs to be done to combat fraud.
• 73% believe that cracking down on fraud would reduce their current auto insurance premium.

See the Aviva press release for further study details and spokesperson information. Visit Aviva’s dedicated insurance fraud website to download the full 2018 Aviva Fraud Report.

Sign-up for the Pollara e-newsletter to stay up-to-date on our latest insights.

November 23, 2018 — Our latest poll for Maclean’s – and our third survey on the NAFTA negotiations and resulting USMCA free trade agreement – reveals that a majority of Canadians who hold an opinion on the subject have positive views of the USMCA deal and the Trudeau Government’s handling of the NAFTA negotiations with the Trump Administration.

A four-in-ten plurality (42%) of Canadians approve of the new USMCA free trade agreement, whereas just over a third (36%) disapprove. However, among those holding an opinion about the deal, a majority (54%) express approval.

• About two-in-ten (22%) either do not have an opinion or are unsure. This is consistent with our previous waves of research on the NAFTA negotiations as well as most public opinion research on free trade deals and foreign policy matters, wherein 20-25% of the public tends to answer Don’t Know/Unsure to these questions, likely reflecting a lower level of public engagement or comfort with this subject matter.

Almost half (46%) of Canadians feel USMCA will be good (30%) or a mix of good and bad (16%) for Canada. Among those holding an opinion on this front, 55% feel it will be good (36%) or both good and bad (19%) for the country.

• Canadians hold somewhat lower expectations of the deal’s impact upon their province, with 40% expecting it will be good (27%) or a mix of good and bad (13%) for their province.
• Almost half (45%) of Canadians feel the deal will be good (35%) or good and bad (10%) for Mexico.
• Three-quarters (75%) feel the deal will be good (69%) or good and bad (6%) for the U.S.

Nearly half (47%) of Canadians – and 54% of those with an opinion – approve of the job the Trudeau Government did in the NAFTA/USMCA negotiations. Four-in-ten (39%) disapprove, and 14% are unsure.

A plurality (39%) of Canadians – and 49% of those with an opinion – feel that the Trudeau Government got the best possible deal, whereas 31% feel they should have continued negotiating for a better deal. Another 10% were opposed to any free trade agreement, and 20% are unsure.

• Regionally speaking, positive assessments of the deal and the government’s performance are most likely to be found in Ontario, BC, and Atlantic Canada, followed by Alberta. Negative assessments are most likely to be found in Quebec, whereas middling sentiment is found in Manitoba/Saskatchewan.

See the full details in our report and associated data tables, as well as further perspective via John Geddes’ article in Maclean’s.

Sign-up for our newsletter to stay updated on our latest insights.

• who caregivers are;
• who caregivers are caring for;
• what tasks caregivers are responsible for;
• where caregivers are turning for information and support;
• how caregiving impacts the lives and health of both the caregiver and the care receiver;
• how caregivers feel about their role as part of the healthcare team; and
• what additional supports or information could help caregivers in their role.

The report can be downloaded from The Change Foundation’s website. In addition to hosting the annual survey reports, their Spotlight on Caregivers webpage will be updated regularly with caregiver stories and additional analyses of the survey data. Check it often.

Sign-up for the Pollara e-newsletter to stay up-to-date on our latest insights.

October 19, 2018 — The Neighbourhood Pharmacy Association of Canada today released the results of a national survey about pharmacare. Pollara Strategic Insights conducted the online survey of 4,173 adult Canadians on behalf of the Association from July 27 to August 3, 2018.

The study found that public engagement on this subject is low, as pharmacare is not a top-of-mind policy or health care priority for Canadians. Thus, the public do not have a clear notion of the specifics of how pharmacare would be executed or the coverage it would provide.

When asked, most (84%) Canadians express conceptual support for a national universal prescription drug program, generally speaking. However, pharmacare is ranked a lower, less urgent, and less deserving priority than most other health care and non-health care issues tested in the survey.

When considering specific approaches to pharmacare, a majority (55%) prefer a program that maintains existing drug plans and either exclusively focusses on providing coverage to those without a plan (20%) or covers those without a plan and allows those with a plan to bill their insurer first and the government second (35%).

Only 30% prefer a program that covers all Canadians and replaces existing government and private plans, and just 15% prefer a program that only focusses on Canadians who face extreme or catastrophic circumstances that require expensive drugs.

For more details, including regional results, please see our report: Pharmacare in Canada: An Overview of Key Findings

Also, see today’s Toronto Star article: Pharmacare is not a top health-care priority for Canadians

Sign-up for the Pollara e-newsletter to stay up-to-date on our latest insights.

October 12, 2018 — In our latest poll for Maclean’s, the Liberals (40%) hold a six-point lead over the Conservatives (34%) among decided voters, with the NDP (12%) and Greens (7%) trailing. The newly-founded People’s Party (PPC) registers 2%. Within Quebec, the BQ and Québec Debout record 15% and 1% support, respectively.

When considering the party leaders, four-in-ten (39%) Canadians feel that Justin Trudeau would make the best Prime Minister. Just over a quarter (27%) feel the same about Andrew Scheer. Less than one-in-ten (8%) prefer Jagmeet Singh. Just 5% feel that Maxime Bernier would be the best PM, but this level of support is more than double the voter support for his party. Two-in-ten Canadians are unsure which of the party leaders would make the best PM.

Given the newness of the PPC, it is not surprising that Maxime Bernier’s party currently ranks low among decided voters. However, the poll suggests there is potential for the party to grow beyond its current standing. Notably, 19% of Conservative voters already consider it a second choice. And, among the five current issues explored in this poll, 5% of Canadians share the PPC’s stances on all issues and 11% share all but one of the party’s policy positions.

Among the key findings:

• Almost six-in-ten (58%) Canadians feel that interprovincial trade barriers should be eliminated, whereas just 12% feel they should be maintained.
• Half (50%) of Canadians feel that health care should continue to be primarily funded and provided by public sector institutions, and only a quarter (25%) feel that people should be able to pay to receive health care services from private sector care providers.
• Just under half (49%) of Canadians feel that supply management is good for Canada, whereas, only two-in-ten (20%) feel it is bad.
• Four-in-ten (39%) Canadians are supportive of regional development and aid programs, whereas a quarter (24%) are opposed.
• The public is split on the federal government’s approach to multiculturalism, as 38% feel it should continue to help ethnocultural communities and celebrate diversity and 37% feel it is going too far on this front – causing division and disunity.

Read the Maclean’s article: Trudeau’s Next Challenge: Free Trade at Home

For more details, including regional results, please see our report: Federal Political Scene, Fall 2018

Sign-up for the Pollara e-newsletter to stay up-to-date on our latest insights.

October 5, 2018 — The Common Good Retirement Initiative today released the results of their national survey of employers, employees, contractors, and freelancers in the not-for-profit and charitable sector. On behalf of Common Good, Pollara Strategic Insights designed, executed, and analysed the results of the study, which was conducted from May to September 2018.

The survey was designed to identify employer and employee needs, challenges, attitudes, and preferences regarding retirement savings and planning – and, ultimately, to provide guidance to Common Good as they strive to build the best possible retirement plan for the sector. In total, 441 employers and 504 employees (including contract and freelance employees) from the sector participated in the survey.

Among the key findings:

• Six-in-ten non-profit or charitable sector employees say their employer offers no retirement benefits.
• More than eight-in-ten sector employees feel that offering a workplace retirement plan should be a priority for employers.
• Plan portability as well as applicability to all types of workers (including freelancers) were among the most valued and preferred features for a sector retirement plan.

To learn more, download the report from the Common Good website.

Sign-up for the Pollara e-newsletter to stay up-to-date on our latest insights.

October 3, 2018 — With two weeks to go until recreational marijuana is legal, a slim majority (54%) of adult Canadians accepts the new policy. This acceptance is based on a third (35%) providing explicit approval and two-in-ten (19%) expressing ambivalence – effectively providing tacit approval. Four-in-ten (42%) disapprove, and 4% are unsure.

Majority acceptance exists despite the fact that 53% of Canadians have some concerns about legalization and relatively few (13%) report using cannabis in the past 12 months.

Notably, based on expressed intent, legalization appears likely to spur minimal increase in marijuana usage – especially regular usage – at least in the early stages. Less than two-in-ten (17%) say they are likely to buy marijuana through the new legal retail system, including just 5% of those who have never tried it. Among those expressing some likelihood of buying legally, just 12% expect to do so on a regular basis. However, post-legalization opportunities, experiences, and orthodoxy may impact public attitudes and behaviours over the course of time.

These are some of the findings included in the Wave 3 report of Pollara’s subscription-based syndicated study The Public Lens: Legalizing Marijuana – the definitive barometer of public opinion on one of Canada’s most prominent public policy topics. Since March 2017, subscribers to the study have received fresh, semi-annual insights into public and user engagement, perceptions, and attitudes about marijuana as well as their expectations, concerns, support levels, and preferences regarding legalization and various policy elements (ex. timelines, age limits, retail approaches, home growing regulations, pricing, taxation, pardons, edibles, oils, and infused beverages).

For additional research findings, see our short excerpt from the Wave 3 report.

The next wave of the study will be fielded 1-3 months after legalization, with a focus on post-legalization perceptions, experiences, usage patterns, and public/consumer demands on governments, producers, brands, and retail operations. Results will only be available to subscribers. If you are interested in subscribing, please contact us.

Sign-up for the Pollara e-newsletter to stay up-to-date on our latest insights.

September 27, 2018 — The Investment Funds Institute of Canada (IFIC) and Pollara Strategic Insights today released the results of their 13th annual survey of mutual fund investors – the Canadian Mutual Fund Investor Survey. In each year since 2006, IFIC has engaged Pollara to conduct the survey.

The survey was initiated to provide better data around the attitudes and opinions of Canadian mutual fund holders, to identify their needs, expectations, behaviours, and opinions, and to track these over time. The research provides helpful insights into a number of issues including: methods of purchasing mutual funds, the advisor’s role, use of alternative purchase channels, impressions regarding fees, and the use and perceived value of CRM2 statements.

“IFIC invests heavily in research to understand the interaction of policy, regulation and market forces, and this research forms the foundation of IFIC’s evidence-based insights,” said Paul Bourque, President and CEO, IFIC. “A key take away from this year’s Pollara study is that, despite positive results in some areas related to fee understanding, there is room for improvement with the annual reports on fees and performance that investors receive. These results underscore how important it is for us to continue to focus our energies on improving disclosure effectiveness.”

“This year’s study found that confidence in mutual funds has reached the highest point in the past 13 years of our annual tracking research,” stated Craig Worden, President of Pollara Strategic Insights. “It is notable that investor confidence is reaching such heights while we are also finding that mutual fund investors are significantly more aware of CRM2.”

With respect to fee understanding and CRM2 statements, 7 in 10 investors are confident that they understand their mutual fund fees. While investors say they had fewer general conversations about fees and commissions compared to last year, specific conversations about fees paid to the firm and MERs have increased and have consistently increased since the beginning of CRM2. 84% of mutual fund investors who have read their statements report that their CRM2 statements “clearly show the rate of return on my account”.

However, there was a 10% decrease in the number of investors who say the reports are easy to understand (down to 72%) and an 8% decrease in the number who say the statements provide all the necessary information (down to 74%). While there was a slight improvement from last year in those that say the statements “clearly show fees I pay to my advisor’s firm or dealer firm” it remains an overall low number, at 53%.

Some of the key findings include:

• Mutual funds continue to outperform other financial products by wide margins when it comes to investors’ confidence in the product’s ability to help them reach their financial goals – at 89%, this is an all-time high.
• 85% of people who purchase mutual funds continue to do so through an advisor.
• Investors continue to place a strong value on advice and have high levels of trust in their advisor. 76% of mutual fund investors report having used their advisor in the last year for either investment planning, financial planning, or retirement planning.A vast majority agree their advisor is worth their fees and that they encourage them to have better saving and investing habits.
• The majority of investors with advisors continue to prefer their advisor is paid through mutual funds fees. This proportion has increased slightly from 53% last year to 59% this year – the highest level seen since tracking on this question started in 2013.
• Usage of and interest in online tools such as robo-advisors continues to be low, with 23% of mutual fund investors aware of robo-advisors and 3% having used one.

As in previous years, Pollara conducted a live-interviewer telephone survey with a reliable, randomly-selected, representative sample of N=1,000 mutual fund holders aged eighteen years of age or older who make all or some of the decisions regarding mutual fund purchases in their household.

This press release is available in English and French.

The full research report is also available in English and French.

More information about the Investment Funds Institute of Canada (IFIC) as well as additional research on this and related topics can be found on the IFIC website and research portal.

Sign-up for Pollara’s e-newsletter to stay updated on our latest insights.

August 23, 2018 — How do Canadians feel about their level of work-life balance, their amount of social media and smartphone screentime, and the perennial struggle between choosing physical fitness over couch potato entertainment options like video games, sports broadcasts, shows, and movies?

And, how do they feel about the level of participation of other household members in each of these activities?

Time Spent 2018 answers these questions. The study reveals how many Canadians feel that they or other members of their household spend too much time on their cellphones and social media, working, playing video games, and watching sports, movies, and shows on TV, Netflix, YouTube, etc. It also reveals how many Canadians feel that they or other household members do not spend enough time with family, helping out with family errands and housework, and exercising.

Among the noteworthy findings:

• When it comes to work-life balance, about four-in-ten Canadians feel that they or another household member spend too much time working (43%) and not enough time with family (37%).
• When considering screentime, about half of Canadians feel that they or someone else in their household spend too much time on their smartphones/cellphones (58%) or social media (46%).
• When it comes to the struggle between choosing physical fitness over couch potato entertainment, most (72%) Canadians feel that they or another household member do not spend enough time exercising. Moreover, half (55%) feel that too much time is spent watching shows and movies.

Overall, when identifying activities where too much or not enough time is spent, it is notable that Canadians tend to point the finger of criticism at themselves much more so than at other household members.

For the full survey results, including demographic and regional breakdowns of the findings, please see our report: Time Spent 2018

Sign-up for our newsletter to stay updated on our latest insights.

August 22, 2018 — Results of the 13th edition of the Health Care in Canada (HCIC) survey were announced today in Ottawa. Established in 1998, the HCIC Survey is Canada’s longest-running, most in-depth survey of the public, general/family physicians, specialists, nurses, pharmacists, allied health professionals, and health care administrators. It identifies and tracks perceived strengths, areas of concern, key current issues, and opportunities for improvement in health care quality, accessibility and affordability.

The 2018 edition is the 13th wave of the study, with additional regular waves of research scheduled in the years ahead. This edition of Canada’s report card on the health care system looked at a variety of issues including opinions about chronic disease prescription usage, timeliness of access to health care, challenges faced by non-professional caregivers, and options for end-of-life care and the opioid crisis. Among the highlights of this year’s survey:

• Wait times are the top concern. Some 43% of the public and 31-41% of health professionals identified wait times as the most important health care issue in Canada. According to respondents, timely access to the health care system has decreased over the last 5 years and only health care administrators think timely access will improve in the next 5 years.
• Team-based health care is considered the best way to increase access to health professionals. While 80% of the public support encouraging health professionals to work in teams with other types of health care providers, the level of support varies amongst health care providers (62-72%) and stands at only 38% for administrators.
• Six-in-ten Canadians diagnosed with a chronic disease don’t take their medicines as prescribed. The top reported reasons for non-adherence were forgetfulness and taking medication based upon how the individual feels.

Since its inception in 1998, the HCIC survey has been conducted by Pollara Strategic Insights, supported by the HCIC survey partners, with principal funding from Merck Canada. The HCIC survey partners and sponsors are a broad group of national, multi-institutional health care stakeholders including many of the country’s top professional associations, not-for-profit health organizations, and institutions: the Canadian Cancer Society; Canadian Home Care Association; Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association; Canadian Medical Association; Canadian Nurses Association; Canadian Pharmacists Association; Constance-Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; McGill University; Health Charities Coalition of Canada; HealthCareCAN; Innovative Medicines Canada; Institute of Health Economics; Studer Group Canada; Merck Canada; Strive Health Management; and, CareNet Health Management Consulting.

The 2018 survey results can be found at the HCIC website, hosted by McGill University. This site acts as the public repository for all data, findings, reporting, and publications arising from the current and past editions of the HCIC Survey. However, you can visit the Latest Insights webpage of www.pollara.com to view forthcoming publications and webinar presentations on the 2018 results. Sign-up for our newsletter to receive updates.

August 8, 2018 — Our annual provincial benchmarking survey reveals that the reputation scores for Ontario’s hospitals remain steady and moderately positive – overall and in terms of quality of care.  Overall, about six-in-ten Ontarians are at least moderately satisfied with their primary hospital on an overall (58%) and quality of care (61%) basis.

Across the regions, hospital impression ratings are higher in the East and Southwest, and lower in Hamilton-Niagara and the North – with slight increases in the Southwest and declines in Hamilton-Niagara since 2017. Toronto and the 905 GTA Belt remain steady with ratings aligned with the average.

Full details in our report: Hospital Reputation in Ontario, 2018

Sign-up for our newsletter to stay updated on our latest insights.

August 3, 2018 — Our annual provincial benchmarking survey reveals that Ontarians’ municipal satisfaction levels remain steady and moderately positive – in terms of both governance and services. Overall, at least six-in-ten Ontarians are at least moderately satisfied with their local government as well as the quality and range of services provided.

However, not every region is satisfied.

Municipal satisfaction is highest in the 905 GTA Belt and the East, followed by the City of Toronto. Notably, the 905 GTA Belt posts moderate increases in satisfaction compared to the 2017 wave of our study.

The North remains the least satisfied – with just half or less expressing satisfaction on the three elements tested.  The Southwest and Hamilton-Niagara also post relatively low satisfaction levels – especially with local municipal governance, as just 48% and 55%, respectively, are satisfied in this regard.

Full details in our report: Municipal Satisfaction in Ontario, 2018

Sign-up for our newsletter to stay updated on our latest insights.

June 24, 2018 — Have time for some coffee or tea and a good read?  Click the links below for three pertinent readings that we are currently enjoying:

Dispelling lingering myths of elections past, pollsters nailed the vote in Ontario (Robert Benzie, Toronto Star)

“The polls were right.” 

The Slippery Math of Causation (Pradeep Mutalik, Quanta Magazine)

“Although we tend to credit or blame things on a single major cause, in nature and in science there are almost always multiple factors…” 

How One Man’s Bad Math Helped Ruin Decades of English Soccer (Joe Sykes and Neil Paine, FiveThirtyEight)

Sometimes the Next Big Thing isn’t the Next Big Thing. Even worse, sometimes it’s based on an inaccurate, overly simplistic interpretation.

January 21, 2018 — Canadians have felt that the country’s economy has not recovered from recession every year since 2008 in Pollara Strategic Insights’ annual Economic Outlook study – until now. However, the national 10-year high in sentiment masks regional disparities.

The current wave of the study, conducted in December 2017, reveals that half (50%) of Canadians finally feel that the economy is in a period of growth, which is a significant increase of 16 percentage points over last year.  Notably, just a third (35%) feel that the country is in a recession, a major decline of 22 points compared to last year.

• The exceptions are the majorities of residents of Saskatchewan (57%) and Alberta (56%) feeling that Canada is in recession.   Majorities of residents of Ontario (55%) and Quebec (56%) feeling that the economy is growing. Residents of BC (48% growth vs. 33% recession) and Manitoba (46% vs. 35%) are more likely to feel the economy is growing, whereas Atlantic Canada is split (42% vs. 41%).

These are the results from the 23^rd wave of Pollara Strategic Insights’ Economic Outlook Study – Canada’s definitive and longest-running study of the public’s perceptions of the economy and their own personal finances.  The online survey was conducted from December 11 to 18, 2017 among a random sample of 1,207 adult Canadians.  As a guideline, a probability sample of this size carries a margin of error of ±2.8%, 19 times out of 20.  The margin of error is larger for sub-segments.

EMOTIONAL ASSOCIATIONS

Overall, according to Pollara’s Emotional Index, the economy does tend to stir more negative than positive emotions, but last year’s trend towards a more positive economic mood continues. More than half (56%) of Canadians feel at least one negative emotion about the economy (-7 since last year; -16 since two years ago) and 44% feel at least one positive emotion (+3; +7). The most prevalent negative emotion is worry (38%) and the most prevalent positive emotion is optimism (28%).

EXPECTATIONS FOR THE CANADIAN ECONOMY IMPROVING

Canadians aren’t sure what to expect for the economy in 2018, as a third (36%) expect it to neither improve nor decline, and a quarter (27%) expect it to improve (up 5% compared to year ago).  Another quarter (26%) expect the economy to decline, and 12% are unsure.

Similarly, a quarter (27%; +4) of Canadians also expect the country’s employment situation to improve in 2018, with another 38% expecting it to remain the same. Just a quarter (23%) expect it to get worse, and 11% are unsure.

EXPECTATIONS FOR THE AMERICAN ECONOMY BLEAK

The international context is important, as the grass appears to look greener north of the 49^th parallel for Canadians. There is increased economic optimism in Canada while the public also reports increased pessimism about the U.S. economy to the south. Notably, just 19% (-8 compared to last year) expect the U.S. economy to improve, whereas four-in-ten (43%) expect it to get worse. Two-in-ten (22%) expect it to remain the same, and 16% are unsure.

PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION POSITIVE BUT WORSENING

Although Canadian views on the economy are notably improved, perceptions and expectations of their own personal finances are slightly more negative compared to last year. Nevertheless, Canadians do hold more positive than negative views of their personal financial situation. When considering their own finances, half (53%; -3) say they are holding their own and two-in-ten (21%; -7) say they are getting ahead. A quarter (24%; +4) are losing ground.

• BC (32%) and Saskatchewan (31%) residents were most likely to be losing ground, whereas Ontario (25%), Manitoba (23%), and Quebec (21%) residents were most likely to be getting ahead.

Overall, according to Pollara’s Emotional Index, Canadians’ personal financial situation stirs more positive than negative emotions, with six-in-ten (62%; -3 compared to last year) Canadians feeling at least one positive emotion about their personal finances and 49% feeling at least one negative emotion (+1). The most prevalent positive emotions are calm (38%), confidence (35%), and optimism (34%), whereas the most prevalent negative emotion is worry (33%).

VIEWS WITHIN NAFTA CONTEXT

This wave of the Economic Outlook study included questions about the current NAFTA talks between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico.  (See our website for the separate release on these results.)  During our analysis of the study data, we found a correlation between those Canadians who feel NAFTA has been bad for the economy (14%) and those who are more likely to report negative assessments of the economy and their financial situation.

For example:

• Two-thirds (66%) of Canadians who feel that NAFTA is good for the national economy say we are in a period of growth, whereas a majority (55%) of those who feel NAFTA is bad for the economy say we are in a recession.
• Three-in-ten (29%) Canadians who feel that NAFTA is good for the national economy say they are getting ahead financially, whereas 19% say they are losing ground. The reverse holds true for those who feel that NAFTA is bad for the economy: 18% say they are getting ahead and nearly four-in-ten (37%) say they are losing ground. Similarly, 60% of those who feel the economy is growing say NAFTA is good for Canada compared to just 37% of those who say we are in recession.

These results raise the question of whether the NAFTA-negative cohort of Canadians has suffered real or perceived impacts to their financial livelihood due to the free trade agreement. Regardless, this cohort is notably more likely to be found among Canada’s lower income and education brackets.  Almost four-in-ten (38%) NAFTA-negative Canadians report a household income of $50,000 or less compared to less than a quarter (23%) of NAFTA-positive Canadians.  Similarly, NAFTA-negative Canadians are much more likely to hold a college or technical school education (40%) than NAFTA-positive Canadians (27%), and much less likely to hold a university degree (40% vs. 59%).

To learn more, download Pollara’s 2018 Economic Outlook.

Sign-up for our newsletter to stay updated on our latest insights.

January 12, 2018 — Just 14% of Canadians expect NAFTA to be cancelled, despite rampant speculation in political circles and the editorial pages that President Donald Trump will do exactly that.  On the other hand, just 8% expect the current NAFTA deal will emerge unchanged.

A majority (52%) expect a new deal – although that majority is split down the middle over whether it will be generally fair to all three countries (25%) or overly favourable to the U.S. (27%). A quarter (26%) are not sure of what to expect of the trade talks.

A similar proportion (23%) is not sure whether the current NAFTA deal has been good or bad for Canada. But three times more Canadians feel NAFTA has been good for Canada (46%) than bad (14%).

These are the results from a new national survey conducted by Pollara Strategic Insights. The online survey was conducted from December 11 to 18, 2017 among a random sample of 1,207 adult Canadians.  As a guideline, a probability sample of this size carries a margin of error of ±2.8%, 19 times out of 20.  The margin of error is larger for sub-segments.

Canadians do not want the Trudeau Government to make a new NAFTA deal at any cost.  A majority (54%) prefer to make a deal only with moderate or minor concessions to the U.S., with just one-in-ten (11%) willing to make a deal that delivers major concessions to the U.S.

More Canadians (45%) approve of the Trudeau Government’s job performance on this file, with only a quarter (27%) expressing disapproval – although approval is higher in Ontario (47%), Quebec (50%), and Atlantic Canada (50%) than in Alberta (33%), Saskatchewan (37%), Manitoba (40%) and BC (42%)

About a quarter (28%) of Canadians are unsure, which is a consistent finding in most surveys on trade agreements – as about a quarter of the public appears largely unengaged in these matters.

Read Pollara’s Report on Canadian Views on NAFTA

Sign-up for our newsletter to stay updated on our latest insights.